process musings

Now, if I am imprisoned in the ghetto, somebody is keeping me there. I can’t walk out because of the warden. There are two people you always find in prison: the man in the prison and the man who is keeping him there.

~James Baldwin – What Price Freedom?

From NPR – American Lives: James Baldwin, ‘Lifting The Veil’

Posted on May 16, 2013

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=129281259

This is an excerpt from NPR’s story on James Baldwin. I have been been intrigued by Baldwin. His writing lures me.

“The writer James Baldwin once made a scathing comment about his fellow Americans: “It is astonishing that in a country so devoted to the individual, so many people should be afraid to speak.”

As an openly gay, African-American writer living through the battle for civil rights, Baldwin had reason to be afraid — and yet, he wasn’t. A television interviewer once asked Baldwin to describe the challenges he faced starting his career as “a black, impoverished homosexual,” to which Baldwin laughed and replied: “I thought I’d hit the jackpot.”

Several of Baldwin’s essays, speeches and articles are collected in a new book called The Cross of Redemption. Randall Kenan, who edited the collection, talks to NPR’s Steve Inskeep about Baldwin’s complicated identity — and how his work challenged black and white readers alike.”

It is astonishing that in a country so devoted to the individual, so many people should be afraid to speak.

~James Baldwin

Zizek: Love is Evil

Posted on April 24, 2013

I have not posted in about, more so for the reason that course work is taking it’s toll. Nevertheless, Dr. Faber took the first hour of the course Process and Postmodern Thought to briefly discuss Slavoj Zizek’s “Love is Evil.” I thought it was interesting to post, and see where it goes. Continue Reading

Living continuity is something that matters, an important aspect of our experience. But the way it matters is not a given on which we would be authorized to lean, in order to organize everything else. In other words, the task of philosophy is to interpret common sense, not to follow any commonsensical claim in particular, because as soon as it is given doctrinal authority it will lead to the repression of other commonsensical claims.

~Isabelle Stengers, “Thinking with Deleuze and Whitehead” in Deleuze, Whitehead, Bergson: Rhizomatic Connections, 37-8.

It is the task of speculation to urge observation beyond the boundaries of its delusive completeness, and to urge the doctrines of science beyond their delusive air of finality.

World Religions: the Ajivika Sect

Posted on February 7, 2013

One great aspect about attending Claremont Lincoln University is their commitment to global peace building. This is accomplished by joining people from all religions, and share in dialogue, speaking on current issues, theology, etc.

I am currently taking a course on Jainism philosophy and ecology, and one of the projects was to briefly write a half-page synopsis of a given Indian group/sect. I was given the Ajivika sect. The research was interesting, and I thought I would share it with you. At the end I will also provide additional sites to further inquire about this particular sect.

The word in language is half someone elses. It becomes ones own only when the speaker populates it with his own intention, his own accent, when he appropriates the word, adapting it to his own semantic and expressive intention. Prior to this moment of appropriation, the word does not exist in a neutral and impersonal language (it is not, after all, out of a dictionary that the speaker gets his words!), but rather it exists in other people’s mouths, in other people’s contexts, serving other people’s intentions: it is from there that one must take the word, and make it ones own.

Orientalism and Religion, Richard King, p. 112

Posted on February 3, 2013

“The logic of comparison which is, on the face of it, concerned with difference functions rather as a logic of identity , in which the Indian subject does not enjoy independent status, and is made intelligible only in opposition to the fundamental or privileged values of Western modernity … In the hegemonic discourse of modernity and liberalism, the Western subject has been conceived as an individuated self-conscious authorial presence (the author of his own activities) … [T]he Indian is not simply different from the W esterner, but is his exact inverse.”

Critique of western Judaeo Christian tradition on Hinduism
Orientalism and Religion by Richard King

http://www.amazon.com/Orientalism-Religion-Post-Colonial-Theory-Mystic/dp/0415202582

Horizontal-izing the Vertical, Eradicating the Extremes: Scales of Value

Posted on February 1, 2013

When we think we think in bifurcations. Up/down. Left/right. Right/wrong. This way of thinking causes either/or mentality. It indicates that one is right, and the other is wrong.

But what would happen if we flatten it out? We make what is vertical thinking horizontal? What if we said that in order to have one, you need the other? That it is relationally intertwined so that if one does not exist, the other does not?

Now what if we got rid of the extremes altogether? Instead of right and wrong, just or unjust, we have scales of lesser or greater value. You see, what is absolutely right, absolutely wrong? When we incorporate culture, education, values, race, class, etc., etc., all the categories (if we can break ourselves down to categories), or better yet, when we know ourselves, we develop values that shape our world.

Other Sites I Follow

Tag Cloud